If you have been a FedEx Contracted Service Provider (CSP) for more than a few years, you are likely familiar with the shift in how contract negotiations are handled. Long gone are the days of every negotiation being a lengthy, open-ended virtual table negotiation for every single agreement. In their place, we have the MESO program—Multiple Equivalent Simultaneous Offers.
On the surface, this system seems efficient. It presents three distinct (but equal?) options, allowing contractors to choose the path that best fits their operational style. However, after five plus years of this program, a troubling trend is emerging. While the MESO program streamlined the process for FedEx, it may be inadvertently suppressing contractor margins and driving good veteran operators out of the network.
This is the first of a two-part series exploring the MESO dynamic. In this post, we’ll break down the problem: how accepting "convenient" offers creates a cycle of inaccurate data that hurts your bottom line.